What kind of study resources will help me understand the Bible better?

Many resources, written and digital, are available to help us understand the Bible. Here are a few resources I use:

Vine’s Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words. This book gives us the meanings of the Greek text. Like English words, Greek words will have different shades of meaning based on how they are used. This book gives the various rendering of the words and where they are used in Scripture, and gives the contextual meaning in those places.

Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible. If you are familiar with your version of the Bible, such as the King James Version, then get the concordance for your version. This book is good if you can’t remember a verse, but you know a word or two of the verse. You look up the word (like in a dictionary) and following the word is a list of every verse in the Bible containing that word. You could also do a word study with the list – just look up each verse to see how the word is used. This will often deepen your understanding of the doctrinal term. This book also cross-references with a Greek and Hebrew dictionary at the back so you can learn the original definition of the word.

The Interlinear Greek-English New Testament and The Interlinear Hebrew-English Old Testament. These books give you the actual Greek (or Hebrew) words with the English translation right above the word. You can see the word order chosen by the writers. You’ll also be able to tell which Greek or Hebrew word was used, and from there look it up in Vine’s or Strong’s.

New Bible Almanac. This book gives you the historical and cultural setting of the Bible, such as the money, marriage customs, government structure, weapons, agriculture, and so on. A very important book that helps us understand why the Bible characters did what they did, and illuminates some of obscure passages in the Bible.

Bible Dictionary. The Bible is full of words we don’t use in regular life. It’s important to understand them and not guess at their meaning when we come across them in the Bible.

The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict. This book outlines the many proofs that validate what the Bible says. It builds up a solid case as to why we know the resurrection of Jesus is true, for example.

Bible Handbook. This book gives a summary of every book of the Bible, including charts, maps, and timelines, outlines, keywords, key verses, and special considerations. If you are new to the Bible, this is a handy book to have at your side.

Commentary. A commentary is an author’s comments on almost every verse in the Bible. Many commentaries exist, from concise one-volume works to 30-volume sets. Some commentaries cover only a single book while others cover all sixty-six books. The Bible Knowledge Commentary (2-book set) is a good place to start for your first full-Bible commentary.

Parallel Bible. This resource contains two or more versions of the Bible in one volume so you can see how the translators have interpreted each passage. This book can give you a deeper or broader perspective of each passage than one version alone could do.

These are just a few helps I’ve used over the years. Many other books will cover apologetics (how to defend your faith), marriage and family, prayer, worship, prophecy and the end times, and many other topics. Visit your Christian bookstore or go online to find these and many others.

What Do You Think?

a. If you’ve never used a Bible study help before, which one of the above would you pick first, and why?

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

Why did Jesus speak in parables?

A parable is a story using everyday events to illustrate a truth. This was Jesus’ main mode of teaching the public. “But without a parable He did not speak to them. And when they were alone, He explained all things to His disciples” (Mark 4:34).

The disciples asked the question many Christians have asked, “Why do You speak to them in parables?” (Matthew 13:10). Jesus gave a full and fascinating answer over the next several verses. We usually think that a parable is used to explain a truth. Jesus’ reason is surprisingly different.

“Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them” (Matthew 13:14-15).

Jesus used parables to tell the public about the kingdom of God to fulfill prophecy. Prophecy states that the Jewish people will hear but not understand. They will listen to truth about the kingdom, but not know how to apply it. Let’s look at an example.

In the Parable of the Sower, Jesus tells us why the seed (teachings about the kingdom of God) do not produce results. In one case, it’s because people are distracted by the cares of this world or decieved by riches, and these prevent the word of God from making a difference in their lives (Matthew 13:22).

How many of you are not growing in your faith because you are more concerned for the things of this life, or for wealth, so you have little time for the word of God? Then you are hearing the word, but not understanding it – you don’t see your precarious position and repent of it. The truth always demands change on the part of the hearer.

Only to his disciples does he explain everything: “Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given” (Matthew 13:11). How can you tell if you are one of these privileged people?

Jesus explains: “For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath” (Matthew 13:12). If you put the kingdom teaching to use and change, God will add more to it. If you apply those new words, God will add even more to it, and you will grow in understanding and wisdom. If you are not growing, it is because you are not applying the word and, according to Jesus’ teaching, God is taking away even what little you had. This was the state of the Jews at the time Jesus came, and it is the state of many today in the churches.

“But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear” (Matthew 13:16).

What Do You Think?

a. Do you think about what the word of God means for you, and how it should affect your life? Why or why not?

b. What is so important in your life that you choose it over studying the word of God?

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

If some verses are missing from some Bibles, then is the Bible perfectly preserved?

As a whole, the texts are amazingly well preserved. Some modern Bibles use a variety of manuscripts to translate the text. In choosing some manuscripts, Bible translators will leave out the parts not contained in other manuscripts. You may look at the bottom of the pages of many modern Bible translations to read the variant readings for yourself. You’ll find that the readings are very slight and do not change the meanings of the texts. No Bible theology is changed with the minor word changes you will find.

You can still base your whole life on the Word of God. If you are suspicious, simply read several versions of the Word when you do your daily Bible reading. Many students of the Bible follow this practice.

What Do You Think?

a. If someone tells you to keep track of all the emails that did not reach your email box, how could you possibly do this if the emails did not get through? Similarly, if verses did not appear in the original manuscripts, how could somebody claim they were missing?

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

How is it possible for the vegetation to have appeared before the sun?

In the normal order of things, a plant needs the Sun in order to grow. In God’s act of creation, we find that God created vegetation on the third day, and then God created the sun on the fourth day. I don’t find it a problem to leave the plants in the dark for just one day. Cover a houseplant for twenty-four hours and it’ll live!

On the other hand, I do find it a problem to have the the days of Genesis equal vast ages as opposed to 24-hour days. How could vegetation live for thousands or millions of years if there were no Sun?

Quite a few people find the order of creation in Genesis to be absurd. God created light and darkness before the sun; he created an expanse of nothingness between waters, and then caused dry land to appear out of the water. God creating everything out of normal order demonstrates the magnificence of his power and control. He is not limited in the same way we are.

What Do You Think?

a. In what sequential order do you think our natural laws were established? Did they appear in operation all at once?

b. If God can do anything, couldn’t he create the universe in any order he wanted to?

Posted in Science and Evolution, The Bible | Leave a comment

Why do Christians use quotes from the Bible instead of formulating ideas and opinions of their own?

Christians who quote the Bible for perspectives in life are saying that God’s perspective is unchanging and trustworthy. Your parents say one thing, your experience teaches something else, your teachers have other perspectives, and your friend goads you in yet another direction. You grow up and your values change. What was important to you at nine years old is not the same at nineteen or fifty-nine years. Your perspective can also change with your mood. So, how do you know which view to follow? God’s view is consistent and will always hold true across time and culture. “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever” (Hebrews 13:8).

A manufacturer of a widget is often the best source to consult for advice on their widget, so God, being the Creator of all, his manual, the Bible, is the best source to consult on how life works. As we see in the book you hold in your hands, the Bible addresses and answers some of life’s toughest spiritual questions.

We believe that we were born sinners and that this world will show us how to live sinful lives. But only the Bible will teach us how to live this life in a way that pleases God. The world will tell us one thing about sex, relationships, life and death, paying taxes, spending money, ordering our households, and parenting, and God will have something to say about them too. If we want to live lives that honor God, we turn to the Bible for instruction in all these things. “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16-17).

Christians are well able to form their own opinions on a wide variety of subjects – and they don’t all agree with each other! So we certainly can hold our own counsel; we have free will; we’ll evaluate and consider according to our present understanding.

What Do You Think?

a. Have you ever derived any good ideas worth keeping from books you’ve read?

b. Have you ever had ideas and opinions changed by anything you’ve read?

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

How can the Word of God be infallible if fallible humans wrote it?

It helps to understand what Christians mean by the Word of God. The Word contains the words of saints and sinners, of men and demons. Although it quotes sinners and demons, it is the Word of God simply because God wanted those words preserved for us to read.

The words in the Bible are words God had moved men to write down. God chose the words, but let the writers’ personalities show through. Here is one way to see God’s hand in the Bible: imagine giving a quiz to forty students in one university class. Have them write down what they think about the meaning of life, about death and the afterlife, heaven and @#!*% , punishment, spirituality, God, and love. You would get a wide range of opinions, just like you would on any Internet bulletin board topic.

But the Bible is consistent in its view of these very controversial subjects. It was written by about forty men over a period of over a thousand years, in several languages and countries and cultures. Yet they are united in their views of God, life and death, heaven and @#!*% , and other biblical doctrines.2 This harmony is one of the most important aspects that point to the Bible’s authorship of God. God used fallible men to write a book that has outlasted the fall of civilizations.

What Do You Think?

a. Fallible men and women make amazing scientific discoveries all the time. Because fallible scientists developed the theory of evolution, should we discard it on that basis? Why or why not?

b. If you found out that forty students all wrote the same answer to an essay question, wouldn’t you suspect they had all borrowed from the same source, such as from each other or from the Internet?


2. McDowell, Josh, The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict. (Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville 1999.) p 6.

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

If the Bible can’t even add up numbers correctly, as in the case of pi, why should we rely on it?

Here is the verse: “Then he made the Sea of cast bronze, ten cubits from one brim to the other; it was completely round. Its height was five cubits, and a line of thirty cubits measured its circumference” (1 Kings 7:23). These were the dimensions given for a large round vessel.

When my wife told me we were only getting twenty miles per gallon with our station wagon, she was rounding off the number. It would be unusual for her to say, “Guess what? I got 19.662 miles per gallon on my last tank!” We know when someone is just rounding off the number.

In the same way, someone would be amused if I answered their question of, “How old are you?” with, “I am 48 years, 11 months, 4 days, 12 hours, and 23 minutes old.” Anyone would be satisfied with “48 years old,” “Almost 49 years,” or even, “I’ll be 49 this month.” Using a whole number just comes naturally to us.

The Bible supplied whole numbers for the diameter of a vessel and its circumference. Pi is the ratio of circumference divided by diameter, which is always 3.1415. When you do the math regarding the recorded circumference (30 cubits) and the diameter (10 cubits) of a giant bowl, it appears that pi = 3. To be accurate, the 30-cubit figure should have been 31.415 cubits.

I believe the Bible rounds off the measurements, just like we do with many of our measurements. At that time, in a non-technological age, the people measured in whole numbers. In some cases, they would measure something with the span of their hand, which is the width of a hand with the fingers spread apart. How accurate can you get with that?

What Do You Think?

a. Is it reasonable to insist that people in ancient civilizations must have decimal-point accuracy in their measurements?

b. If you can respect the cultural differences of less-advanced nations, including their makeshift measuring devices, can God be faulted for doing the same? Why or why not?

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

How can you tell whether people have translated the Old Testament books correctly if we don’t have the originals?

I remember watching kids playing the game of Telephone, where the teacher whispers a message in the ear of the child at one end of the line, and the children pass it on to the other end of the line, whispering the message from child to child. Of course, by the time it reaches the last child, the message ended up hopelessly (and comically) garbled. Isn’t that what happened to the transmission of the Bible texts? Well, no. The difference is that the Jews treated the text as the Word of God reverently, to be preserved carefully. How do we know the texts were preserved faithfully?

Enter the Dead Sea Scrolls. Some of the scrolls date back to 250 B.C. So scholars were able to take the later manuscripts and compare them to the same biblical books dated a thousand years earlier. Their findings indicate that the Hebrews treated the words of God with the care they deserved. For instance, “of the 166 words in one chapter, Isaiah 53, there are only seventeen letters in question. Ten of these letters are simply a matter of spelling, which does not affect the sense. Four more letters are minor stylistic changes, such as conjunctions. The remaining three letters comprise the word ‘light,’ which is added in verse 11, and does not affect the meaning greatly. Thus, in one chapter of 166 words, there is only one word (three letters) in question after a thousand years of transmission-and this word does not significantly change the meaning of the passage.”3

Today you can get some versions of the Bible containing the variations between the manuscripts in the margins of those versions. You can read for yourself that the differences are minor. The Bible texts have been preserved very well indeed!

What Do You Think?

a. Nowadays digital files can be duplicated perfectly, pixel for pixel, with a few mouse clicks. The ancient world, however, had to copy things the hard way. The Hebrew scribe double-checked his work by counting across so many letters and down so many letters to arrive at the same letter in the middle of the manuscript as the original. If the next person had to copy your entire page letter-for-letter by hand, what steps would you take to ensure absolute accuracy?

b. Would you expect the next person to copy the manuscript accurately if he did not believe in the text’s importance?


3. McDowell, Josh, The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict. (Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville 1999.) pp78-79.

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

Isn’t the story of Adam and Eve merely symbolic?

It is historical, not symbolic, for several reasons:

The story is treated as a straightforward, literal account in Genesis, and acknowledged in the epistles, such as here: “For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression” (1 Timothy 2:13-14).

  • Real consequences (sin) came from the interaction of Adam and Eve with the Tempter.
  • Real offspring with stories of their own came from Adam and Eve.
  • Adam’s name is part of Jesus’ genealogy in Luke 3:38.

In every case, Adam and Eve are treated as real people who knew God, received instruction from him, disobeyed him, and suffered the consequences of their sin – bringing death into the world. Through their story we understand that God gave them dominion over the earth and the free will to accept his rule over their lives or reject it. Because of their fall, God gave a beautiful promise of salvation through the offspring of Eve (Genesis 3:15). The rest of the Old Testament follows her offspring, the lineage that leads to the promised deliverer, Jesus Christ.

What Do You Think?

a. Just as some people believe Adam is a mythical person with an existence having no basis in fact, some people believe the same for Santa Claus. The Saint Nicholas figure who actually formed the basis for the symbol we revere is little known. Can you believe there are other symbols whose origins are now obscure, but were based on fact?

b. Even now scientists and nutritionists are trying to figure out why we all can’t live twice as long. Death seems to be alien. Did you know that because of Adam’s sin, we all die? Jesus came as the second Adam, so that through his death and resurrection, we who believe in Jesus may all be made alive with him.

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

Aren’t people narrow-minded for taking the Bible so literally?

The Bible is composed of several different types of literature. For instance, the books of Moses up to Psalms are historical records of literal events. The Psalms are poetical in many places. Proverbs is wisdom literature. The prophetical books record prophet’s speeches, many of which include many instances of symbolism. The Gospels are a narrative which focuses on Jesus, the central character. The epistles of Paul are his message to churches. Revelation is prophetical, or apocalyptic literature.

In our everyday reading and writing, we may use figures of speech of every kind, and we usually know when to take them literally or not. We can usually detect a simile (“he’s as sly as a fox”), figures of speech (“it’s raining cats and dogs”), irony (“as clear as mud”), sarcasm (“yeah, that’s really going to work”), and euphemisms (“passed away”). We don’t take them literally; and in the same way we don’t take similar word treatments in the Bible literally.

Perhaps this question is referring to the many stories told in the Bible. Do we take them literally? When a miracle occurs, do we accept it at face value? Did God really create Adam and Eve, or is the account a metaphor?

One of the reasons we’ll have a hard time taking such stories literally is because we don’t believe in a God who is working in the world. In that case, understandably, any miracles would be hard to believe. What is fascinating to me, though, is that all the stories in the Bible, occurring over centuries, have a running theme through them all.

We may get bored reading all the genealogies, but they follow the bloodline to Jesus Christ. Therefore, every person in those genealogies is an actual, historical figure. God allowed some prophets to perform miracles, and such acts cemented their calling in the people’s eyes. When Jesus did miracles, he proved that the promised kingdom was at hand – a kingdom with no death (so he raised people from the dead), nor physical impairments (so he healed many infirmities and sicknesses), and no more spiritual oppression (so he cast out demons).

Keep in mind, too, that not everyone believed in the miracles that occurred. I speak especially of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. When the women told the disciples that they has seen the risen Christ, they refused to believe – until Jesus appeared in their locked room on day. Such human reactions lend credibility to the miracle accounts.

It’s not narrow-minded to take the Bible literally where it’s supposed to be understood literally, and figuratively where appropriate – it’s just good sense.

What Do You Think?

a. If you can’t accept the idea that God exists and can work miracles, are you narrow-minded?

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

Is there any truth to the Bible codes?

The Bible has several fascinating traits that some claim are the fingerprint of God in the book. Some claim that one such discovery is the Bible Code. This method seeks to find hidden messages that relate to modern events by using the computer to find equidistant letter sequences, or ELS. That is, by noting every fourth letter, or every fifth letter, and so on, in the original Hebrew of the OT, one will inevitably find messages or words spelled out.

Another way to investigate the Bible for hidden meanings is by checking the meaning of the proper names. For instance, Adam means Man. Enoch means Teaching. Noah means Rest. Chuck Missler reported an astonishing message that was spelled out by the genealogy from Adam through Moses. First, take the names in order: Adam Seth Enosh Kenan Mahalalel Jared Enoch Methuselah Lamech Noah. Now put their meanings in order: “Man (is) appointed mortal sorrow; (but) the Blessed God shall come down teaching (that) His death shall bring (the) despairing rest.” That’s remarkable – the Gospel is spelled out in the names of these men.

Some scholars have noted the recurrence of the number seven (or multiples of seven) throughout the Bible. The Sabbath on the seventh day; the seven years of plenty and the seven years of famine in Egypt; the seven priests and seven trumpets marching around Jericho; the Sabbath Year of the land are well-known examples. Even more astonishing, though, is the occurrence of the number 7 behind the scenes. Look at some of the amazing discoveries made by Dr. Ivan Panin:

For example, the first 17 verses of Matthew deal with the genealogy of Jesus Christ. The number seven figures predominantly in many ways:

The number of words which are nouns is exactly 56, or 7 x 8.
The Greek word “the” occurs most frequently in the passage: exactly 56 times, or 7 x 8.
There are two main sections in the passage: verses 1-11, and 12-17. In the first main section, the number of Greek vocabulary words used is 49, or 7 x 7.
Of these 49 words, the number of those beginning with a vowel is 28, or 7 x 4. The number of words beginning with a consonant is 21, or 7 x 3.
The total numbers of letters in these 49 words is 266, or 7 x 38 – exactly! The number of vowels among these 266 letters is 140, or 7 x 20. The number of consonants is 126, or 7 x 18 – exactly.
Of the 49 words, the number of words which occur more than once is 35, or 7 x 5. The number of words occurring only once is 14, or 7 x 2. The number of words which occur in only one form is exactly 42, or 7 x 6. The number of words appearing in more than one form is also 7.
The number of the 49 Greek vocabulary words which are nouns is 42, or 7 x 6. Of the nouns, 35 are proper names, or exactly 7 x 5. These 35 names are used 63 times, or 7 x 9. The number of male names is exactly 28, or 7 x 4. These male names occur 56 times, or 7 x 8. The number which are not male names is 7.
Three women are mentioned – Tamar, Rahab, and Ruth. The number of Greek letters in these three names is 14, 7 x 2.

Still another Bible oddity occurs when you realize that every Hebrew and Greek letter has a number equivalent (the Greek or Hebrew equivalent of A = 1, B = 2, C = 3). What happens when you add up those numbers? Let’s take the passage of John 21:11: “Simon Peter went up and drew the net to land full of great fishes, an hundred and fifty and three.” Does the figure of 153 have any parallels? Yes: In the record of the miraculous draught, the word for “fishes” comes to 1,224, or 8 x 153, and the words for “the net” have the same value, 1,224. “Multitude of fishes” is 1,069, or 16 x 153. The numerical equivalent of verses 9-11 gets 28,460, or 186 x 153. The letters added up for all of verse 11 is 15,758 or 103 x 153.

 

These are not the only methods of seeing messages behind the words. But do let us remember that what God has plainly written is to be taken of greater value than the hidden meanings.

What Do You Think?

a. Do these amazing Bible facts convince you that the Bible was inspired by God? Why or why not?


Resources:

http://www.biblecodedigest.com/

http://www.khouse.org/

http://www.khouse.org/

http://www.asis.com/

http://www.wordworx.co.nz/

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

How can a 2,000-year-old Bible be practical today?

In a Bible study I attended, we read a chapter ahead of time and jotted down our impressions. Then we met and shared our findings as we were called upon. In this way we marched through the Bible chapter by chapter in order. Many who participated found something pertinent in what they studied that applied to their current life situation.

Perhaps you have never read the Bible in a way that would make sense to you. Let me give you a practical way to read the Bible. Following this format, you may be surprised to find God working in your life. Some newcomers who are not Christians were asked to just follow these steps and they have discovered God on their own – and gained the value for reading the Bible themselves.

Some people follow this method of Bible study daily. Three steps are involved. Let’s take them in order.

 

Chapter breakdown
First we read the chapter from beginning to end, just like we would for any other book. (Also like any other nook, we start at the beginning of the book.) Each chapter has passages divided up into numbered sections called verses. As you read the chapter, pay attention to natural divisions. Then jot down those divisions and summarize them. Note every division so every passage has been included. Try not to skip this step. It’s purpose is to help you consider a passage in its own context. Yep – people misunderstand the Bible because they take verses out of context. (Many modern Bibles already break up the chapters with suheadings. Ignore those and make up your own.) Here is an example.

 

1 Corinthians 3 Sample Chapter Breakdown

1-4 Paul considered them to be babes in Christ, carnal, not spiritual. (They had set one minister of God as better than another and divided the church.)5-7 Paul and Apollos are merely ministers. (So the Corinthians should not divide the church over them.)

8-10 Paul had his work and Apollos had his. They are equally valuable and work together.

11-13 We build our faith on Jesus, not on his ministers.

14-17 We will be rewarded or not based on our results – what we did with Jesus …

18-23 … So don’t boast in men, but in God.

Meaning
In this phase we ask ourselves, “What does this mean to me?” Go back over the chapter and see if there is any section that stands out. Think about what it is saying. Write down your thoughts in a few sentences. Many people find this one of the most important parts of their study.

 

Application

On this final step we ask ourselves, “What am I going to do about it?” Here is where you consider what action to take based on what you wrote. This is one of the most important steps and one people neglect the most – responding to what they read.

 

If you are one of those who think the Bible has nothing to offer for daily life, try the steps above for a whole book and see if it changes your life for the better. Just start with the gospel of Matthew (look it up in your Bible’s Table of Contents if you have to) and work your way through the Bible from there.

Why should it change our lives? Because the Bible is the means through which God himself communicates to us. When you respond to his Word, then God responds in kind.

What Do You Think?

a. If the Bible is the most important book in the world – because through it God speaks to us – should we study it carefully? Why or why not?

b. Will the Bible change our lives if we did not respond to it’s teachings? What does that say about the importance of our involvement?

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

What authority determines how people should interpret the Bible?

When we interpret a Bible passage, we are trying to find out what the writer originally meant to say. At that stage, we are not trying to figure out what it means. It’s important to learn the interpretation before we make an application of the verse. When we misunderstand the interpretation, we may make wrong choices about what we should do, or form wrong doctrines.

“Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost” (2 Peter 1:20-21). God has set the interpretation. We don’t make up our own to suit our times. Every word, every letter written, was exactly what God intended to put down, so we should study them carefully with the respect they deserve.

We can discover a writer’s original meaning, its interpretation, by using several common-sense approaches. Here are a few of them.

Start with the plain sense of the word. Another way to put it is, “If the literal sense makes sense, seek no other sense lest you get nonsense.” If the Bible writer used the word “day,” then we should accept that meaning unless there is a strong reason not to. That strong reason should be found in the Scripture, not from our times. This means we are to accept the literal meaning whenever possible, unless the Bible shows otherwise. In this way the Bible interprets itself.

The Bible uses figurative language. Sometimes the Bible will plainly state that it’s not to be taken literally, such as the use of the word “like” in the passage.

Keep the historical setting or usage in mind. For instance, we use the word “church” to mean the place where we gather, as in “go to church.” However, the literal meaning of the word is “called-out ones.” The believers are the church, not the building where they meet.

Keep a Bible dictionary handy, and don’t take for granted your understanding of the many specialized words you encounter. The Greek or Hebrew Interlinears are handy too; they show the English translation of the term right above the Greek or Hebrew word used. A Bible Almanac is also handy; it sheds light on the customs and times of the various cultures. Fortunately, good software exists with many excellent tools.

The Bible is about Jesus. He is the central theme. Make sure no interpretation dishonors him.

Check the context. Read the passages before and after the verse being studied. Just as you would not read at random through a mystery novel and expect to understand the story, so you should read the Bible and its books and chapters straight through. Many verses are more reliably interpreted when the entire chapter and surrounding chapters are read.

We can learn more about a word by finding out how it is used in other places in the Bible. Beware, though: if the usage of the word is in a very different context, then it may not apply. For instance, “house” would be different in “he went into the house,” and “all the house of Israel.” Many, many misinterpretations have come about because unlike passages have not been taken into account. Just think – our own words have more than one meaning, and the Greek and Hebrew do to. “Will,” for instance, is someone’s name, is a legal document, and indicates intent. The context will determine which meaning to use.

The Bible does not contradict itself! Though it was penned by about 40 authors over 1500 or so years, God has the same views throughout of heaven and @#!*% , life and death, God and man.

Don’t make up ideas where the Bible is silent. Don’t read into passages of Scripture words or meanings it doesn’t support. Don’t base a doctrine on a single passage of Scripture. It’s hard to be certain without corroborating texts.

Don’t try to force the interpretation to accept modern ideas or science. We look at the world through the Bible, not the Bible through the world.

What authority do we use to interpret the Bible? The Bible is the best authority and interprets itself plainly if we use common-sense rules like the above.

What Do You Think?

a. When you read a novel, do you read a sentence here and there, skipping pages as you go along? If not, should you read the Bible this way? Why or why not?

b. The Bible has its own meanings for “priest,” “church,” and “saint,” that you may not have. What is the usual understanding of these terms and how does the Bible differ?

c. Do you agree that the steps above are common-sense ways of getting to know what a text is saying? Why or why not?


References:

http://www.bible-truth.org/

www.carm.org/

gracethrufaith.com/

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

What if the early church tried to fake the gospel stories?

People have made many attempts to show that the church has corrupted the early texts in order to play up Jesus as a phony Messiah. There are several problems with this approach.

1. Surely the early church would have portrayed its adherents more heroic in the gospel accounts. Instead, we have Jesus’ followers misunderstanding him, doubting him, even fleeing from him when he was taken to court.

2. We have a male-centric community made into a laughing-stock as Christ appears to Mary before his disciples. Also, the women believed in Jesus more readily than the apostles did!

3. We have the foolish words of Jesus’ disciples intact. Peter’s denial if Jesus is there. Why would the early church want to preserve his story? We have the disciples words for when they wanted to rain fire down on a city. We have disciples who proudly argued among themselves who would be greatest in the kingdom. Why are these words still there?

4. If Jesus did not indeed die on the cross and rise again, why did the disciples not produce the body to escape death? Eleven of the disciples died cruel deaths (crucified upside down; limbs tied to separate horses and pulled apart; beheaded; tied up to the back of a horse and dragged to death on the streets). All of this could have been avoided if they had recanted and told the torturers where they hid the body. Not even Jesus’ enemies could produce the body. But the body was nowhere to be found. Jesus had risen from the dead and will give eternal life and an inheritance untold to those who would persist in faith to the end.

What Do You Think?

a. If your aim in an autobiography was to elevate yourself through the inclusion of untrue accounts, how would you deal with the people who knew you and who could expose your stories as fabrications?

b. How would you change the Bible accounts to make Jesus more heroic than before? Would you keep the OT in place? Why was the Bible written the way it was?

c. Doesn’t the inclusion of imperfect people in the gospel accounts lend an element of truth to the stories?

Posted in The Bible | Leave a comment

What’s so great about the blood of Jesus?

In the Old Testament, God instructed the Israelites to sacrifice certain animals in order to have their sins covered. However, the blood of these animals was just to cover their sins until Jesus came, whose blood had greater power to deal with sin. Exactly what makes the blood of Jesus so precious?

When we confess our sin and repent, the blood of Jesus cleanses us of all sin (1 John 1:7). The blood of bulls and goats could never take away sins (Hebrews 10:4).

When Jesus shed his blood, he inaugurated a new covenant of faith in his blood, which is based on better promises than the old covenant under the law (Matthew 26:28). The old covenant required animals’ blood to be spilled. In our case, we may confess our sin and believe that Jesus’ blood cleanses us to know its power.

The blood of Jesus gives us peace (Colossians 1:20, Hebrews 9:14). When we trust in Christ’s blood by faith after confessing our sin, we are relieved and no longer have the need to remember it over and over in guilt and shame. (If we believe we must do more to obtain forgiveness, like do more works or be a better person – in effect bargaining with God – then we do not approach forgiveness from faith, so anguish continues over our sin. We are not believing that a loving God readily forgives his children. In this case, we make Christ’s blood less than it really is.)

Our good works could not make us righteous before God because sin is the issue that keeps us from God. Christ’s blood not only takes away our sin, but makes us righteous (Romans 5:9) before God – as though we had never sinned! The slate is wiped clean.

The blood purchases us and we become God’s own children (Acts 20:28, 1 Peter 1:88-19, Revelation 5:9).

When cleansed by the blood, we are sanctified, that is, ready for God to put us into service for him (Hebrews 13:12).

After sacrificing the animals, the people still could not go into the holiest place where God himself dwelt. Even the priest could not enter except once a year after a sacrifice had been acceptably prepared. But through Christ’s blood we may enter God’s presence freely at any time (Ephesians 2:13, Hebrews 10:19).

In the future, the saints will overcome the antichrist figure through the blood of the Lamb (Revelation 12:11). They will continue to believe God and confess their sins while the antichrist figure tells people that sin is not an issue.

Because the blood of Jesus is so important in God’s plan of bringing us to himself, and the spilt blood of Jesus on the cross demonstrates God’s wondrous love toward sinful humanity, those who scoff at the blood will receive greater punishment (Hebrew 10:19).

What Do You Think?

a. Nothing of the blood of the animal sacrifices were enough to forgive sin. Only the blood of the sinless Lamb of God is enough to cleanse us of all sin. What does this say about God’s love when we know that Jesus was treated unfairly by those around him?

b. Since the blood cleanses us of a bad conscience, should we rely on good works to try to erase any guilt we feel after sinning?

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

How can you tell that Jesus was a historical figure?

The number of those who say that Jesus never lived is getting smaller as the years go by. We have many documents by people near Jesus’ time who have referred to him as if he were a real person.

We find several sources from secular men commenting on Christ. Cornelias Tacitus, a historian of Rome, mentioned that “Christus” was put to death by Pontus Pilate.

Pliny the Younger, governor of Bithynia, wrote about killing Christians young and old, male and female, and that genuine Christians would not curse Christ. He mentioned that the people thought Christ to be a God.

Thallas, circa A.D. 52, wrote history, and included an account of darkness that surrounded the land during the afternoon when Jesus was crucified. The Bible says that it was dark during that time, even though it was day.

Some time after A.D. 70, a philosopher, writing to his son from prison, likened Jesus to Socrates and Protagoras.

Early Jews have also written about Jesus. These works are important because they are unfriendly toward Jesus. (You would expect his friends to speak up for him, but his enemies?) The Talmud, a central text of mainstream Judaism, mentions the crucifixion of Jesus (“Yeshu”) on a Passover (see John 19:14). It explains away Jesus’ miracles as the work of a sorcerer rather than say they did not occur at all. The Talmud also mentions Jesus’ disciples. The Talmud, in referring to the virgin birth, claims that Mary was an adulteress.

Jewish historian Josephus also wrote of Jesus, saying that he performed wonderful works, and drew many Jews and Gentiles to himself. He mentions Pilate and Christ’s crucifixion, and the resurrection of Jesus.

We have many early sources from Christians as well that affirm many facets of Jesus as recorded in the gospel accounts. Much proof indeed exists for the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth.

What Do You Think?

a. We know much about George Washington from many of his letters and speeches recorded during his lifetime. Should you accept or reject his works the same way you would the writings that refer to Jesus as a historical person?


McDowell, Josh, The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict. (Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville 1999.)

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

Did Jesus ever sin?

Quite a few young Christians believe that Jesus sinned, or disobeyed the Father. Did Jesus sin? The testimony of his friend and disciple John says no: “And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin” (1 John 3:5).

The testimony of his betrayer Judas, who had remorse for turning a faultless one over to his enemies, says no: “Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood” (Matthew 27:3-4a).

The testimony of his enemies, who tried to find something of which to accuse him and failed, says no: “And the chief priests and all the council sought for witness against Jesus to put him to death; and found none. For many bare false witness against him, but their witness agreed not together” (Mark 14:55-56).

The testimony of Pilate the judge says no: “Pilate saith unto him, What is truth? And when he had said this, he went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find in him no fault at all” (John 18:38).

How important is it that we believe that Jesus never sinned? Very. Jesus came to take on himself the sins of the whole world, suffer, and die for them. If he had sinned, then he could not bear the sins of others – he would have to die for his own sins. God did not find anyone worthy of bearing the sins of the world from mankind. So his Son, by prearranged plan, stepped out.

The one who knew no sin became sin for us. The one who was innocent bore our guilt. The Light of the World entered the darkness of @#!*% . The Eternal Life tasted death for us all that he might rescue those who believe.

What Do You Think?

a. Do you find it difficult to believe that anyone could live without sinning?

b. Jesus came to save us from sin’s power. What has he made available to you to make it possible for you to resist sin?

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

How can you be so sure that Jesus is the true Messiah?

God removed all the guesswork. He gave us many indicators that point to one man only. If you had a description of a man who would be born in a certain city, live during a particular year, and die in a certain manner, you would already have narrowed the search tremendously by these three factors alone. Suppose you also knew his racial heritage, family lineage, sex, and special abilities?

God did all this and more when he told us in advance about the Messiah, Jesus Christ. He wanted to make sure we would know him when he came. One or two prophecies would not suffice to identify the man – so how about over one hundred?

The following are several prophecies by which we can identify God’s Messiah so that we may trust wholly in the one God sent for salvation and power. The prophecies were already in print for several hundred years before Jesus came on the scene.

 

A preacher will prepare the way
Prophecy: Isaiah 40:3
Fulfillment: Luke 1:17

 

Will be alive at a particular point in history
Prophecy: Daniel 9:24-26 (49+434 years), Nehemiah 2:1-8 (445 B.C.)
Fulfillment: Jesus alive in30 A.D.

 

Belong to the family lineage of Judah
Prophecy: Isaiah 37:31
Fulfillment: Matthew 1:1-2, 16

 

Belong to the family lineage of Jesse
Prophecy: Isaiah 11:1-5, 10
Fulfillment: Matthew 1:1-2a, 5-6, 16

 

Belong to the family lineage of King David
Prophecy: Isaiah 16:5
Fulfillment: Matthew 1:1-2A, 6, 16

 

Born a male
Prophecy: Isaiah 9:6-7
Fulfillment: Mark 1:1

 

Born of a virgin
Prophecy: Isaiah 7:14
Fulfillment: Matthew 1:20-23

 

Born in Bethlehem in Judah
Prophecy: Micah 5:2
Fulfillment: Matthew 2:1

 

Travel in Nazareth
Prophecy: Isaiah 9:1-2
Fulfillment: Matthew 4:13-16

 

Will reach out to the Gentiles
Prophecy: Isaiah 42:1-4, 6
Fulfillment: Matthew 12:14-21

 

Will heal miraculously
Prophecy: Isaiah 29:18
Fulfillment: Luke 7:20-22

 

Despised and rejected
Prophecy: Isaiah 53:3
Fulfillment: John 19:15

 

Rejected by his own brothers
Prophecy: Psalms 69:8
Fulfillment: John 7:1-5

 

Betrayed by a friend
Prophecy: Psalm 41:9
Fulfillment: John 13:18, 26-27

 

Betrayed for 30 pieces of silver
Prophecy: Zechariah 11:12
Fulfillment: Matthew 26:14-15

 

The above silver used to buy potter’s field
Prophecy: Zechariah 11:12-13
Fulfillment: Matthew 27:3-10

 

Disciples would scatter
Prophecy: Zechariah 13:7
Fulfillment: Matthew 26:31

 

Beaten with a rod
Prophecy: Micah 5:1
Fulfillment: Mark 15:19

 

Hands and feet pierced
Prophecy: Psalm 22:16
Fulfillment: John 20:25

 

Gambled for his clothes
Prophecy: Psalm 22:18
Fulfillment: Matthew 27:35

 

Specific insults given, word for word
Prophecy: Psalm 22:8
Fulfillment: Matthew 27:43

 

Given vinegar and gall to drink
Prophecy: Psalm 69:21
Fulfillment: Matthew 27:48

 

Numbered with the transgressors
Prophecy: Isaiah 53:12
Fulfillment: Mark 15:28

 

Made intercession for the transgressors
Prophecy: Isaiah 53:12
Fulfillment: Luke 23:34

 

Cried out to God
Prophecy: Psalm 22:1
Fulfillment: Mark 15:34

 

Side pierced
Prophecy: Isaiah 53:5
Fulfillment: John 19:33-34; 36-37

 

Bones not broken
Prophecy: Psalm 22:17
Fulfillment: John 19:33; 36a

 

Died for our sins
Prophecy: Isaiah 53:5-6
Fulfillment: 1 Corinthians 15:3

 

Buried in a rich man’s tomb
Prophecy: Isaiah 53:9
Fulfillment: Matthew 27:57, 59-60

 

Seated at God’s right hand
Prophecy: Psalm 110:1
Fulfillment: Luke 24:51, Romans 8:34

What Do You Think?

a. How many of the above promises have to be fulfilled in one person before it goes beyond the bounds of coincidence?

b. Is fulfilled prophecy a good way to prove God’s authorship of the Bible?

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

How can we know or believe in Jesus now when we can’t see him?

We believe by logical inference in countless things we can’t see. We can’t see the wind, but we can see the leaves blowing, feel the breeze on our arms, or hear the sound of the gale.

Lawyers seek to prove the invisible all the time. How many times in a television courtroom drama have you ever seen a lawyer place an object on the table and say, “Your honor, I’d like this motive entered as exhibit twenty-three.” We can’t see a motive, but we can infer it by the evidence. Juries do not need to be one hundred percent sure, but can render a confident verdict if it’s beyond a reasonable doubt.

We can infer the presence of Jesus in different ways. Historical documents, religious and secular, affirm his historical existence. The Bible has an excellent reputation among today’s archeologists for its helpful portrayal of ancient customs and locations of cities. The book of Acts in the New Testament has been a boon to archeologists because of its many accurate period references. Historical records overwhelmingly favor the existence of Jesus and the accuracy of the Bible.

We have enough evidence that places Jesus’ life during the early decades of the first century A.D. You can believe in him now because the documents recording his death, burial, and resurrection are trustworthy.

However, this question is more than about knowing whether Jesus existed. You want to know how today’s Christians can know him and follow him with assurance. It all starts with the purpose for why Jesus Christ came: he came to save us from our sins. Our sins have separated us from God, just like you and your friend are separated if you offend him or her grievously. When we come to God acknowledging our sins and repent of them, God forgives us. When we act upon the Bible’s teachings on how to live with other people and how to please God, then we’ll find God following through in our lives.

I remember when I led a woman at my job to Christ. It wasn’t until several months after reading the Bible that she came to me and said, “I know now.” When you follow the Bible, you’ll feel the breezes of God’s work upon your life. You won’t see him, but you’ll know of his work in your life by inference. God wants to prove himself to you!

What Do You Think?

a. Have you ever read a media’s account of a court case and decided that the defendant was innocent or guilty before all the evidence was in?

b. If yes, how could you be so certain, since you probably have never met the defendant before? Did you need very much information before you made your decision?

c. Did you know that other historical writings apart from the Bible mention Jesus? They refer to him as a real person, not a myth or legend.

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

Why did the Son of God die for us on the cross?

We have all sinned. Sin is breaking God’s laws (1 John 3:4). Therefore we must pay the penalty for breaking his laws, just like we pay a penalty for breaking a traffic law. However, the penalty for breaking God’s laws is death (Romans 6:23).

God does not want us to die for our sins. We see through the animal sacrifices he initiated in the Old Testament times that he accepts a substitute for sin. When a Hebrew sinned, he could bring a law-approved animal from his flock, such as a lamb, and give it to the priest. There he was to place his hand on the animal’s head and confess his sin. His sin was transferred to the animal. The man then took a knife and killed the lamb. The lamb died for the man’s sin.

God in love sent his son Jesus in the form of a man to die in our place. When Jesus was on the cross, God placed all the blame of the world upon him (Isaiah 53:5-10). Thus Jesus bore our penalty of death. He became the “Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). His death satisfied God’s sense of justice and showed us how much he loved us. Because of Jesus’ perfect sacrifice, all animal sacrifices are now obsolete.

Now, if we confess that we are sinners and trust Jesus, God will forgive our sins and grant us the righteousness we need for the kingdom of God (John 3:16).

What Do You Think?

a. If Jesus died in your place, then doesn’t that indicate that God has already found you worthy of death, and your good deeds won’t help you to heaven?

b. If Jesus’ death in your place was determined by God long ago, doesn’t that imply that God had already positioned a “lifesaver” within your reach?

c. If Jesus’ sacrificial death on the cross was the only thing that an all-knowing God could figure out to save you and still keep justice, shouldn’t that be reason enough to accept his plan?

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

Is it true that if I simply believe in Jesus I’ll get to heaven?

Yes! The Bible tells us to trust in Jesus to save us rather than trust in our good character or good deeds. The problem is that we’d rather believe that we are good persons; that our good deeds earn us a place in heaven.

This is where people get defensive. Who wants to believe that he is worthy of @#!*% ? The Ten Commandments are to help us see that we are sinners. If you break one of the Commandments, you are guilty as a law-breaker and thus not acceptable for entrance into heaven. One commandment tells us not to covet our neighbor’s goods or wife (Exodus 20:17). If we wished we could have anything that the person near us has, we’ve broken this commandment, and we are sinners and in need of salvation from @#!*% . Justice must be served. But God calls us to believe in Jesus and he will forgive all. Continue with God and he will change us from the inside out.

It seems so simple – “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved” (Acts 16:31a) – but people resist because pride holds them back. Pride in our religious or ethnic heritage, accomplishments, wealth, knowledge, and so on, can present excuses that prevent us from believing in Jesus. Society has taught us that those factors are good and important. The Bible tells us that these considerations are not enough to merit the righteousness we need for heaven. Only faith in Jesus will grant us that entrance.

God opens the door to heaven to all people in the world through faith. If you don’t have enough good deeds, wealth, knowledge, or family connections, or if you believe you have sinned too greatly, these factors are not enough to withhold God’s acceptance of you through simple faith in Jesus Christ.

Is faith simple? Yes! But not when you want to get into heaven another way.

What Do You Think?

a. Many people can’t believe because believing in something involves accepting something without evidence, or even in contradiction to plain evidence. Do you hold the same objection?

b. If God prophesied among more than one hundred times in Scripture that Jesus would be born in a certain city, die in a particular manner through no crime of his own, speak certain words, have certain tasks and purposes, experience opposition, and many other traits – all of which came to pass – wouldn’t that be enough of a foundation to believe?

c. Did you know that the world’s definition of faith and belief is different than the Bible’s definition? Jesus pointed out his miraculous works to John the Baptist to prove that he was the Messiah. In John chapter seven the people were evaluating whether Jesus was the Messiah by his miraculous works, while others compared the circumstances of his birth to Scripture prophecy to determine if he was the one God promised to send. Does that sound like the Bible is asking us to believe without evidence?

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

Is Jesus the God of the Old Testament?

Jesus makes appearances in the OT several times. The NT gives us some clues to as to where he appeared.

In some cases we find the Father and the Son together in the OT, such as in Genesis 1:26, where God says, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.” God is a trinity of persons – of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – so he uses “us” to refer to himself as a creator in this place.

In the NT we learn the name of this world’s Creator. John 1:1-3 and Hebrews 1:2 tell us that Jesus made all things. So the divine Creator at the beginning of Genesis is Jesus (“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth”).

In Hebrews 7:3 we learn some interesting background of the king of Salem whom Abraham met in Genesis 14:18-20: “Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.” This is a perfect description of Jesus. The passage matches up with another episode in Jesus’ life when he said to the Jews, “Before Abraham was, I am” (John 8:58b). The Jews immediately picked up stones to stone Jesus, which was the punishment for blasphemy, indicating that Jesus was plainly proclaiming his deity.

So, yes, the Old Testament records some instances in which Jesus appeared prior to his divine birth through Mary.

What Do You Think?

a. Were you surprised to find Jesus in the OT? Why or why not?

b. Do these appearances, as supported by the NT, help establish his deity? Why or why not?

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

If Jesus died for our sins, then what is the point of confessing?

Jesus died for the sins of the whole world. But the benefits are conditional upon believing that he died for you, so the benefit of relief from sin’s punishment is not automatic. When we believe that God sent his Son to die for us personally, that we are worthy of punishment for our sins and Jesus took that punishment onto himself, then God applies forgiveness.

Thus at the cross we see God’s justice (Jesus was punished for all our sins) and God’s mercy (he will forgive our sins freely).

When you do wrong to someone, it is appropriate to tell that person you are sorry. This tells the person wronged that you are seeking reconciliation; you want the relationship mended. The same dynamics apply between a Christian and God. When you confess your sin, you are acknowledging with God that he was right about your sin, and you recognize that it is personal. Your confession acknowledges that you did not merely break a rule, but disobeyed God himself. That confession is your earnest declaration that you want your relationship with God to continue.

We help heal a relationship when we acknowledge our wrongdoing, whether with another person or with God.

What Do You Think?

a. When you do wrong, do you usually try to cover it up or pretend it never happened? Why or why not?

b. Are you uncomfortable when people try to tell you they are sorry? Why or why not?

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

Jesus never claimed to be God, did he?

Jesus did not leave us any doubt as to his deity. The Israelites of his day knew exactly what he was saying. Claiming to be God is blasphemy. Several times in the gospel narrative, we find the Israelites picking up stones and plainly accusing him of claiming to be God: “The Jews answered him, saying, ‘For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God’ ” (John 10:33).

John chapter five has plain statements that affirms Jesus’ claim to deity. Let’s look at them.

 

Power to raise the dead
None of the doctors and scientists in the world can bring a person to life once again. Only at the intervention of God can that happen. “For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will” (John 5:21). Here, Jesus has the power to raise people from the dead.

He repeats this claim again: “Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation” (5:28-29).

 

Authority to judge all people
Judgment of the world belongs to God alone, who has authority over all his creation, and who can judge from his perfect knowledge to mete out perfect punishments. Jesus claimed to have this authority: “For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son (5:22). He repeats it again: ” And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man” (5:27).

 

Jesus and God worthy of honor
No one shares honor with God. We are fallen. It is only by God’s grace that we walk with him. But Jesus has this honor: ” That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him” (5:23).

 

Granting eternal life
No matter what human being we may trust in this life, he cannot grant us any special infusion of life. Certainly he can’t give us a promise of life after death! Yet Jesus claims that those who believe in his words will receive a special blessing from God that changes their lives forever: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life” (5:24).

 

Would a normal person make claims like these? If not, why would they be different coming from the mouth of Jesus? Because through various prophecies, God described the Messiah who would save his people. So Jesus spoke naturally as the one who fulfilled those prophecies. Furthermore, he healed the afflicted, raised the dead, and cast out demons. The prophecies, works, and words validate one another. Jesus was God who came in the flesh to fulfill all his promises made to the Jewish people.

What Do You Think?

a. If you received an announcement that a high-level government official was going to visit you, you would expect him to behave a dignified way. Would you be suspicious of his status if he behaved very poorly from the outset? What if he behaved as you expected?

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

Why does Jesus have to be the only way to heaven?

We are accustomed to having options available to us in everything. The department store aisle displays eight brands of bread, four kinds of mops, and twelve kinds of digital cameras. In Windows we can delete a file in several ways: by hitting the Delete key, clicking on Edit then on Delete, or by dragging the file to the trash can. Any car we get from the dealer comes with a wide variety of options to help customize our ride.

So we consider the number of religions in the world and wonder why there’s only one way to heaven. Why do Christians insist that Jesus is the only way? Why can’t we pick and choose the parts we want to believe?

If you have a friend and destroyed the relationship, there’s usually only one way to fix it – admit your mistake to the other person and make it right. Apart from admitting fault and showing you’re truly sorry, healing of a relationship probably won’t happen. You don’t get many options here.

For a similar reason, we don’t get many options for getting to heaven. That’s because we are estranged from God – and we need to make it right. It’s usually the grieved party that sets the terms for reconciliation, and that’s the case between God and us. God’s terms amount to us admitting that we’ve wronged him, and putting our faith in his Son Jesus.

However, more than a broken relationship is at stake here. We have broken God’s laws, like the Ten Commandments, and that means we must bear the death penalty. Fortunately, God has made a way to forgive that debt and make us righteous – through faith in Jesus. In this scenario, it simply doesn’t make sense for someone to make things right by ignoring the God he or she wronged. Only one way is open to heaven – but the way is foolproof. “Jesus saith unto him, ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me’ ” (John 14:6).

Limiting choices to only one way is not necessarily a bad thing. In many cases, only one road leads from the highway to the scenic site overlooking the mountain grandeur. Only one way – but the destination is glorious!

What Do You Think?

a. I know of only one way to get the cap off my toothpaste container. Is that necessarily a bad thing?

b. Isn’t life simplified enormously when there is only one possible way to accomplish certain tasks?

c. What is wrong with Jesus being the only way if his is the one way that actually works?

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

Isn’t it hypocritical of God to command us not to kill, yet he had killed millions at the Flood?

When a policeman arrests a person for murder, a judge condemns him to death, and a special group straps him to a death chair and kills him, none of them are saying, “Do as I do.” None of them are saying, “As I do to him, do to me.” The reason is that criminals deserve the sentence they get. The law enforcement personnel are carrying out their orders to uphold law and order.

God is the ultimate law enforcement officer. He is officer, judge, jury and executioner all rolled up into one. He is better than all these men because He has perfect knowledge of every circumstance and the hearts of men.

Murder is what persons does to others when they have no authority to take life. Law enforcement officers, CIA, FBI, SWAT, the military, guards, certain spies, etc., fall under a different heading of people who are authorized to use force to kill when necessary. It is not murder in those instances, and it isn’t murder when God carries out the death penalty.

Let’s look further into the instance of the Flood deaths, shall we?
1. According to Genesis 6:5-8, God did not kill nice people like your next-door neighbors. He killed people who were so sinful that a man boasted to his wives that he killed a man for hurting him (Genesis 4:23b).
2. The passage also says that God was not vengeful or angry, but sorrowful for what He had to do.
3. God did not wipe out everyone at the first murder, of Cain and Abel. He patiently waited for men to change their ways, but they got worse and worse until there was only one righteous man left: Noah. I’d say that God patiently gave man every chance He could. He saved the last righteous man standing! God did not kill Noah, did He?
4. God did not sit idly by while the world went down the toilet. He sent prophet after prophet to warn men of coming judgment, but none listened except Noah (2 Peter 2:5, Jude 14-15a).
People are upset over the Flood deaths, but few know the circumstances. I hope the above helps you to see the story in a new light. God is still warning of coming judgment. I hope you will join Noah and stand for God, rather than join those who reject His salvation.

What Do You Think?

a. Our nation’s laws forbid murder, yet the armed forces are allowed to kill in certain circumstances. Is that a contradiction? What keeps it from being hypocrisy?

b. God is in the place of authority, having the decision of life and death. Would his “do as I do” apply to normal citizens, or to other people who have authority to use deadly force?

c. If I use the weed-trimmer in the back yard, then tell my five-year-old boy not to touch it, am I being hypocritical? If a police officer kills in the line of duty, but tells his children not to kill anyone, is the officer being hypocritical? Why or why not?

Posted in God | Leave a comment

Doesn’t the Bible say that God created evil?

Here is the verse: “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things” (Isaiah 45:7). The word evil in this passage has been mistranslated in the King James Version of the Bible. As it is with our English sentences, we must derive the meaning from the context.

The writer adopted a form unique to poetic Hebrew literature which incorporates parallelism and word contrast. For instance, light and darkness are opposites. But what about peace and evil? Evil is not the opposite of peace. For the passage to be a successful parallelism, evil should be replaced by a word representing lack of peace. Newer translations of the Bible have corrected this verse. Instead of peace and evil, The New King James Version says, “peace and calamity.” The New International Version says, “prosperity and disaster.”

But what is the passage really saying? The chapter containing this verse is fascinating. In the first eight verses of the chapter, and the last portion of the previous chapter, God tells us that he will use Cyrus, king of Persia, as his tool to free the Israelites from captivity far from their land and rebuild Jerusalem and the temple: “Who says of Cyrus, ‘He is My shepherd, and he shall perform all My pleasure, even saying to Jerusalem, ‘You shall be built,’ and to the temple, ‘Your foundation shall be laid'” (Isaiah 44:28).

What’s amazing about this passage is that Cyrus will not exist for another 140 years! Here is an example of prophecy where God names a person before he existed and tells him what he’ll do. Indeed, through Cyrus, God delivered the Jews from their Babylonian captivity. This passage tells us that God brought the Jews into darkness and calamity through their captivity, and God will again bring them light and peace when Cyrus releases them.

What Do You Think?

a. Have you ever had someone take your words out of context, forcing you, or someone who knew you, into explaining what you meant? What does it mean to take something out of context?

b. When you read a story, do you read only a small portion of the page in order to make sense of it? Or do you read the entire story from the beginning to understand the flow of the story?

c. Do you believe the Bible could be better understood if one read it from the beginning?

Posted in God | Leave a comment

What if God does not exist after all?

If the Christian God does not exist after all …

 

Then how did the prophets plainly foretell of Jesus’ coming, complete with the exact name of his birthplace, how he would die, even to pre-quote the words people will say around his crucifixion hundreds of years before they happened? Through approximately one hundred prophecies, the Bible carefully identifies the Son of God with specific details so we would recognize him when he came.

 

How did the Bible accurately foretell the time Jesus will appear on earth, even naming a historically verifiable character (Cyrus) who was not yet born? No modern fortune-teller, psychic, or other holy book has the prophecy fulfillment track record of the Bible.

 

Why didn’t the first century Jews who were against the Christians deny Christ’s miracles? They accused him of being in league with the Devil rather than deny that he healed the blind and raised people from the dead. Why did they have to make up a story about a stolen resurrected body? Jesus said he would rise from the dead and ascend into heaven. The Jews circulated the report that his body was stolen from the tomb because they had to acknowledge that it was indeed missing. The disciples of Jesus were persecuted to death for supposedly robbing the body. If they had hidden the body as the Jews claimed, then they could have produced the body and escaped death.

 

Why does the fossil record show only a handful of disputable transitional samples linking fish to amphibian or any other species? Archaeologists have unearthed millions of fossils—more than enough to find a single undisputable example of evolution.

 

How did the male and female sexual organs, perfectly suitable for the other, appear in nearly every specie of animal and insect? It is ludicrous to accept the idea that male and female sexual organs evolved in lockstep over many millions of years across virtually every kind of beast.

 

These questions are easily answered by the existence of a Creator who wants to make himself known to us. Through the prophecies, he wrote the Bible in a way that showed himself as the author. Through creation he shows us several of his attributes, such as order and law.

What Do You Think?

a. If the Christian God did not exist, would you be relieved? Why or why not?

b. Was your answer to the above question based on what you know about God through personal reading of the Bible, or through other people?

Posted in God | Leave a comment

If God created all things, who created God?

It’s only natural to be curious about how people invent things. When we admire the intricacies of a created object, such as the iTouch or the Sistine Chapel paintings, we naturally are curious about the creator. When people find out that I write, they ask me where I get my ideas from. We enjoy reading biographies of famous people. We’re fascinated by the way the parents and other people shaped their lives.

We see the world with its strange creatures and fantastic formations and wonder about the one who created all things. Then we naturally wonder where God came from.

We ask, “If all things have a creator, then who created God?” Actually, only created things have a creator, so it’s improper to lump God with his creation. God has revealed himself to us in the Bible as having always existed. The Bible says of the Creator of all things: “From everlasting to everlasting, You are God” (Psalm 90:2). In other words, with God alone there was no beginning and no ending. Even Jesus, who was born of Mary in Bethlehem, existed in spirit form before he came in the flesh as a baby in the manger.

What Do You Think?

a. Is there any conceivable way a human being can create something out of nothing? Why or why not?

b. Is a being’s ability to create matter from nothing a sufficient indication of God-like status? Why or why not?

Posted in God | Leave a comment

If the Bible says that love keeps no record of wrongs, then why does God, who is love, keep such records?

Love and judgment are two different things, not opposites, so they can exist together. A federal judge can sentence lawbreakers to prison and still go home and love his kids. Love and hate can also exist together. When we love something, we sometimes hate its opposite. I like it when things are neat and organized, such as an orderly home. By implication, I hate disorderliness. I love it when people treat me well; I hate it when they’re rude.

God loves good; this means he hates evil. God loves us; he is also loves justice. Like any good judge, he will note the evil that men do. The day is coming when God will judge everyone and give us what we deserve. But he will also forgive the wrongs when we turn to him in repentance. One verse that combines his love and justice is Romans 5:8: “But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” This is like a federal judge offering up his son to take the place of the man he has condemned to death: Justice with compassion. God must judge sin, but in love, God chose to punish his son in our place so he could pardon us of all our sins.

We need to be careful not to over-simplify God and make him into a two-dimensional cardboard character. We make this mistake when we overemphasize a general observation (such as his love) and forget he has other traits. That’s like insisting that we compose a painting using only one color. God is love, but that is only one of his attributes. When you paint him with all the colors in the Bible, you’ll end up with a picture of surpassing beauty and majesty!

What Do You Think?

a. Have you ever demonstrated love to one person and still justified passing judgment on another person?

b. If you answered yes to the above question, does this show a defect in your character, or an innate ability to see that different people and situations demand personalized approaches?

Posted in God | Leave a comment