Is being spiritual different than being religious?

Many people would say that they are spiritual, but not religious. The way the world uses these terms, I would say that the “spiritual” person usually believes in a higher power, but doesn’t see the need to join a formal religious organization or church gathering. This “spiritual” person usually has a hodgepodge of beliefs cobbled together from various sources. This person does not need any proof for the validity of his beliefs. “You have your truth and I have mine,” is his mantra. For this “spiritual” person, truth is subjective, not objective.

On the other hand, religious people (again, I’m using the word “religious” the way the world uses it), usually subscribe to a set of beliefs and practices related to their God. With Christianity, that usually means that the Bible is God’s word, which tells its adherents how to live their lives. (Some factions of Christianity have seemingly done away with the use of the Bible.) Ceremonies and symbolic practices are usually part of their religion.

The Bible does not see spiritual and religious as contradictory – it defines the terms in a way the world does not. According to Vine’s dictionary, the Greek word used for “religion” refers to the external observances of one’s faith in God. This includes worship and helping others.

However, the New Testament makes a difference between spiritual and carnal. The carnal are living with the flesh as the foundation. They look to other men and women (1 Corinthians 3:1-4), and thus are “behaving like mere men.” Their values are usually no different than the world’s. Just about every Christian starts out this way. The carnal are also called “babes in Christ” (1 Corinthians 3:1) because they have not grown enough in their faith to look beyond their own needs and desires to the will of God.

On the other hand, the spiritual have Jesus as the foundation for their thinking, motivations, and works. They have moved away from self-centeredness to living their lives for their God. They are biblically religious in that they practice their faith in the real world. Their spirituality is not internal; they show by their lives that Jesus influences their choices in far-reaching ways.

Carnal and spiritual are not just interesting Bible terms. Leading carnal or spiritual lives has eternal consequences. The spiritual life is based on Jesus. The carnal life is based on self. According to 1 Corinthians 3:10-17, our works will be judged. If they turn out to be works of the flesh (outlined in Galatians 5:19-21), the works will be discarded and we will not receive a reward for all that labor. The spiritual works that spring from love for Christ and a desire to honor him according to his will shall receive everlasting rewards.

What Do You Think?

a. Are you spiritual, or carnal?

b. What are you doing that demonstrates your belief in the Christian God?


Vine, W.E., Vine’s Expository dictionary of New Testament Words, MacDonald Publishing Company.

Posted in Religion and Spirituality | Leave a comment

What is the meaning of life?

The many sales of self-help and spiritual-help books tells me that people are hungry to get more out of life. On the other hand, many people do not question their place in life. They are satisfied with the status quo. Their attitude is, “Don’t rock the boat. I’m enjoying my slice of life just fine.” “I’m making do with what I’ve got.”

Usually, a person starts seeking for more when she realizes that she is still not satisfied with life. Her financial or physical health, relationships, or activities has turned her to look for alternatives. For many people, that alternative is spiritual, since the material world has proven to be a disappointment.

So she starts asking, “Isn’t there more to life than this? What is the meaning of life?” Continue reading →

Posted in Religion and Spirituality | Leave a comment

Isn’t it true that all the religions are worshiping the same God?

If you, a stranger, were to come up to me and tell me that your father and my father were the same person because both are human beings, should I immediately assume they were the same father? To see if that were true, we would gather more detail about our fathers and compare them. You say your father was born in California. My father was born in Minnesota. Furthermore, you describe your father as 6′ 2″ tall. My father is 5′ 3″ tall. Lastly, your father is only 52 years old while my father is 82. So we have more than enough indications that our fathers are completely different human beings.

If all the religions simply call their god “God,” then it appears that they are all the same god. What happens when we investigate details about these gods? The Christian God describes himself as three persons in one essence. No other religion describes their god that way. Some religions have god as one person over all, such as the Muslims and Jews. Some religions have many gods, such as the Hindus. It’s when we get into the specifics about each god that we realize that different religions are not worshiping the same God. One religion’s god is human-like while another religion’s god is animal-like in appearance.

Because the details differ so drastically, the gods cannot be the same.

You might say, “Well, maybe the same god is appearing in many different forms.” We know it is not the same god because the gods differ in how they operate. The Christian God created all physical things out of nothing and said it was very good. Another religion says that physical things are evil, and god would never create them; or that god created beings out of other things. The Christian God desires to save all people from their sins through faith in Jesus Christ. Other religions depend on humans performing a variety of good deeds and keeping specific religious traditions in order to be saved. The Christian God promises eternal life and the kingdom of God for all those who believe in Jesus Christ. Other religions make no such promises because salvation depends on the followers’ own efforts.

If they were the same god appearing in different ways, surely there should be more consistency in his message to mankind.

What Do You Think?

a. Over-generalization can result in strange conclusions. Is it true that all religious people in America will vote for the same person for President? If not, then why would someone think we’d all worship the same God?

b. People within the same class will hold diverse views. Do all pet lovers love Scottish Terriers? Do all football fans agree on who is the best quarterback of all time?

c. If the Christians, Muslims, Hindus, and Jews are worshiping the same God, then why would the Muslims, Hindus, and Jews persecute Christians for their beliefs in their lands? Evidently they don’t believe Christians are worshiping their god.

Posted in Religion and Spirituality | Leave a comment

If religions did not exist, wouldn’t there be peace on this planet?

You assume that the presence of religion the only reason we lack peace.

The media is full of reports of people getting into trouble or suffering, and religion is seldom the issue. Are there not troubles based on money, sex, pride, ambition, politics, natural disasters, and disease? I see all kinds of problems arise in my life, and few of them have anything to do with religion. I know the crime series on television are fictitious, but nevertheless, few of the crimes have a basis in religion. As long as you have people in proximity to other people, tensions will flare.

So the answer is no – tensions will continue even if there were no religions.

What Do You Think?

a. What percentage of crime shows have you seen in which religion turned out to be the culprit?

b. How many times were you irritated (lost your peace) this past week by non-religious causes, like someone cutting you off in traffic?

c. Religions are composed of peace-loving people, along with people bent on hurting others. Suppose we narrowed the question further to “If trouble-making religious people did not exist, would there be peace on this planet?” How would everyday life inform your answer?

Posted in Religion and Spirituality | Leave a comment

Isn’t it okay to judge a religion by its misguided followers?

I’ve read online blogs composed of former customers of a store who were disturbed by its salesmen. Based on one event, they would never shop at that store or buy their services again. How many people have had protracted trouble with a particular car mechanic and decided never to buy cars of that brand again? Is it fair to judge a company based on one bad salesperson? Bad experiences with a representative of a company frequently sour us on the company itself.

Religious followers can leave bad impressions as well. The problem is that people don’t know a religion’s teachings except by seeing the religion’s followers. How many people have read the Bible or the Koran? What are people to think when they hear that Islam is a religion of peace, but then read of Islamists blowing themselves up to kill innocent bystanders? Many people have not read the words of Jesus, but they have heard of the Crusades and Inquisition.

We can’t help it if people think negatively toward Christianity when they see a few acting contrary to its teachings. So I like going onto different Internet forums where I can explain exactly what the Bible teaches and clear up misconceptions. Perhaps a person or two will read what I wrote and get a better understanding of what Jesus came to do and teach.

What Do You Think?

a. Careful researchers, such as detectives and investigative journalists, try not to rely on just one source for all their facts. They try to corroborate their information with well-known authorities. They try to interview as many of the players as possible to get the most accurate picture they can. Is this a better means of getting to the truth of a matter?

b. How much work are you willing to engage in to determine the truth of a matter? Does truth matter to you?

c. Do you immediately forward email warnings to your friends without checking to see if they are true? Have you ever visited snopes.com to verify whether the story is accurate or not?

d. Did you believe the emailed story was true simply because a friend forwarded it to you (and you assumed that the friend had already checked the validity of the message)?

Posted in Religion and Spirituality | Leave a comment

Since love is a higher form of motivation, isn’t it improper to be motivated by rewards?

We can answer this by examining how Jesus responded to Peter’s question. Peter wondered what he was going to get after leaving all to follow Jesus:

“Then answered Peter and said unto him [Jesus], Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore? And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name’s sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life” (Matthew 19:27-29).

Jesus did not rebuke Peter for asking what he’ll get for leaving all. Jesus’ positive answer encourages us to reach for the rewards he offers. If God wants to grant us rewards to motivate us to greater endeavor, then who are we to tell him it is wrong to do so?

Salvation comes to us as a gift through no merit of ours. But rewards are not given as gifts. They are for those who have earned them, just as the athlete whose efforts earned her the gold medal. Christ recognized Peter’s extra effort, and it will not go unrewarded.

Paul disciplined his body, and brought “it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway.” (1 Corinthians 9:27). He wanted a full payment for his labor. He recognized that his bodily cravings could invalidate him for a reward. We’ve all heard of men of God who fell because of shameful sin and lost their position. Paul understood that God is a rewarder of those who diligently seek him (Hebrews 11:6b), not of those who fervently seek carnal pursuits, placing their own wills over the will of God. When we know that rewards are given to those who do the will of God faithfully, it will make a difference in how we live.

God will grant crowns to those who meet the conditions. He will reward thrones to those who have served him faithfully. Just about any boy may join the Boy Scouts, but to rise through the ranks in honor, one must earn the badges through effort. Not all will want such honor; they will be happy to make friends and participate in the many enjoyable activities. Many Christians will be content to be saved from the Lake of Fire, and enjoy the many earthly blessings from the Father of lights, but they will miss out on the supreme honor awarded to those who gave their lives in service.

What Do You Think?

a. If a person loves God, but does not do anything that shows it, how would you describe that love?

b. What do you think God is really rewarding, love, or works based on that love? Is there a difference?

c. If we loved the Lord more, in what ways would our works of love change?

Posted in Religion and Spirituality | Leave a comment

Why would the law put a child to death for hitting or cursing his parents?

Here are the two verses:

And he who strikes his father or his mother shall surely be put to death.

And he who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death. (Exodus 21:15, 17)

Remember that this was part of a covenant between God and his people. If they did indeed want God to live in their camp and lead and bless them, then in addition to the blessings he promised, they had to accept a stricter code of conduct with its severe punishments. After all, this was a holy God in their midst protecting them and promising peace, prosperity, and protection-which he by his own power could actually give them.

In God’s plan, the parents would receive the highest honor in the society, and thus are worthy of the highest respect of the children. In many societies, parenting has been greatly devalued, with absent fathers, kids born out-of-wedlock, and child abuse abounds. Here, the children themselves are highly valued and are being held to a high moral standard.

This commandment obviously does not apply to very young children who don’t know any better. It applies to those who refuse to control themselves. Please note that God is not telling the parents to kill or abuse their children. They are to take the disobedient person to the elders for judgment. The elders then render final judgment.

We cannot use these laws in our land because our laws do not reflect a covenant between God and man. Now we have the freedom to curse our nation’s leaders and belittle the soldiers who have spilled blood to protect this liberty. We may insult and disobey our parents. If we do these things, God may not punish us; nevertheless, we’ll still suffer the consequences of strained relationships.

In God’s camp, the people were held to a higher standard because the reward God was going to give them for their faith was greater than any earthly ruler could bestow-life in the kingdom of God with lasting riches and joys unbounded.

Ever since extremists who have sworn to destroy America had attacked the Twin Towers in New York City, we Americans have accepted more laws and inconvenience than we have ever accepted before. Searches at airports are prolonged and flight delays are commonplace. Surveillance cameras are going up at a rapid pace. Civil liberties are eroding. We allow these happenings in the interest of greater safety. How much more would we accept the death penalty for cursing our parents if we knew that the God who opened the Red Sea to save us, the God who destroyed entire Egyptian army single-handedly, has expressed his intentions to love us and protect our nation against all enemies forever?

What Do You Think?

a. Suppose there were a guarantee that your country would experience everlasting peace and freedom from war and disease, and every citizen would prosper in health into old age. However, the law of the land specified capital punishment for chewing gum, smoking, spitting in the street, and children cursing their parents. Would you accept these inconvenient conditions to gain unlimited protection and prosperity?

b. If God had first destroyed all our enemies, would you find the above agreement more acceptable?

Posted in Violence and Atrocities | Leave a comment

Why did an angry God kill everyone at the Flood? (with video slideshow)

Here is what the Bible actually says:

And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord. (Genesis 6:5-8)

A world of murderers
The men God created became so horrible that you would not want to live next door to them. You would fear for your life and the lives of your children and friends. Here’s an example of how bad it was: one of the people boasted to his wives, “I have killed a man for wounding me, even a young man for hurting me” (Genesis 4:23b). If you hurt one of these people, they would kill you and boast to others what they did to you. These people were not like your frieds and neighbors. Continue reading →

Posted in God, Violence and Atrocities | Leave a comment

Why did God tell Moses to kill children?

Here is the passage:

“Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man intimately. But keep alive for yourselves all the young girls who have not known a man intimately” (Numbers 31:17-18).

I read an article of a mother who lives in a gang-infested part of town with her son. Each morning the child dresses for school and the mother checks to make sure he’s not wearing any gang-affiliated colors. Then they pray for his safety. The boy sets off for school, taking a zigzag, maze-like route down alleys and neutral streets to avoid gang members who intimidate other youth.

Reading of youth gangs in newspaper articles like these help me see how bad it can get among the youth. The stories of children killing on campus tell me how bad it can get even with the young. Stories like these shine a glaring beam of light illuminating the problem facing the Hebrews as God brings them into the land he promised them. In other words, we’re not talking about Boy Scouts here.

The Hebrews could not possibly reform the youth of the land they were entering. God was bringing the Hebrews into the land to judge the peoples of gross sin. God is the judge of the whole Earth and it is his prerogative to execute judgment. God did not call the Israelites to destroy all children in the land, however, and he even gave the reasons why children should be killed in this one instance: “Look, these women caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to trespass against the Lord in the incident of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord” (Numbers 31:16). This passage tells us that God limited his judgment to a specific group of people, including their children, for a specific purpose. According to the passage quoted at the beginning of this answer, not all children were to be killed.

Amazingly, God chooses to withhold punishment more often than not. God has declared that all of us today have sinned and are worthy of death. He does not desire that we perish in @#!*% , and for the most part has resisted carrying out the punishment we all deserve. Instead, he invites us to believe on Jesus Christ that we may survive the coming judgment.

What Do You Think?

a. Several children in schools and campuses in recent years have opened fire on teachers and children. If the killers had lived, should they have been tried as children or as adults in the courts? Why or why not?

b. America dropped atom bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in WWII, killing an estimated 120,000 men, women, and children. Was the act justified, even though children were killed? Why or why not?

Posted in Violence and Atrocities | 1 Comment

Why would God command violence toward the Israelites in the Old Testament?

Do keep the violence in perspective. God made a covenant with the people of ancient Israel. The covenant through Moses stated that God would bless them with his protection and provision if they obeyed him, and visit them with war, death, diseases, and other judgments if they turned away from him (Deuteronomy 28:1-68). They knew these conditions in advance and accepted them.

We make a similar agreement with the laws of our land. If we murder someone, we can expect punishments in the form of incarceration or the death penalty. However, we hope the penalties for breaking the law will deter most people.

Today a new covenant is in effect between God and his people. The blessings of the old covenant depended on how well the ancient Israelites obeyed God, and they failed miserably. The new covenant rests on God’s faithfulness and promises, neither of which can fail. We enjoy the blessings of the new covenant when we act in faith toward God.

Why did God treat the nation of Israel so violently? When the nation of Israel turned its back on trusting God, he afflicted the nation in various ways according to his agreement with them. When Israel returned to God, he forgave them as he promised, then brought them peace and prosperity again. The violence was not capricious, but used judiciously to encourage them to return to a proper relationship with their God.

What Do You Think?

a. Do you agree that criminals deserve the violence they experience in prison? Do you agree that ruthless street criminals deserve to die when they are killed by a rival street criminals? Why or why not?

b. Do you agree with the laws of the land that will result in imprisonment or confiscation of your driver’s license if you violate certain state vehicle laws?

Posted in Violence and Atrocities | Leave a comment